The Adaptation of Trouser Blocks
Started by
Sator
, Dec 24 2009 10:57 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Sator
-
- Root Admin
-
- 5,998 posts
Administrator
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sydney, Australia
Posted 24 December 2009 - 10:57 PM
Personally, I think that cutting by block pattern adaptation is a perfectly legitimate way of cutting a bespoke pattern. Whife thought so too, as did T.H. Holding before him. It's all a question of how much adaptation to the figure that is done that makes it a true bespoke pattern.
#2
A TAILOR
-
- Professional
-
- 291 posts
Apprentice
- Gender:Male
- Location:metro chicago
Posted 09 March 2010 - 07:19 AM
WHEN USING TROUSER BLOCKS A CUTTER ALWAYS PICKS THE PATTERN SIZE BY THE SEAT MEASURE.
EVERYTHING ELSE CAN BE ADJUSTED.
EVERYTHING ELSE CAN BE ADJUSTED.
- jeffrey2117 and HautenDandy like this
#3
A TAILOR
-
- Professional
-
- 291 posts
Apprentice
- Gender:Male
- Location:metro chicago
Posted 15 March 2010 - 08:34 AM
oops should have also said that for coats blocks they use the chest size.
those that are new do not realize that the block does not come from thin air.
a block is made by using a draft.
those that are new do not realize that the block does not come from thin air.
a block is made by using a draft.
#4
NW Tailor
-
- Professional
-
- 37 posts
Umsie
- Gender:Female
- Location:The Great Northwest
Posted 17 March 2010 - 04:04 AM
Love this thread... You are so right ~ blocks do not just magically appear!
"The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor."
~Vince Lombardi
~Vince Lombardi
#5
Der Zuschneider
-
- Senior Professional
-
- 2,444 posts
Master
- Gender:Male
- Location:TX, Houston
-
Interests:- German Cutting Systems
- Modern Tailoring by German Semi-Traditional Standards
Posted 18 March 2010 - 08:54 AM
The block pattern has to be chosen by the width of the front pattern respectively the hip girth, nothing else.
- HautenDandy likes this
www.berlinbespokesuits.com
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
