Finally, would like to say that the information and discussion on this website has done more to address questions that I've been tearing my hair out about than any other source. Thanks!
Edited by lionessa, 22 February 2010 - 06:22 PM.
Posted 22 February 2010 - 05:43 PM
Edited by lionessa, 22 February 2010 - 06:22 PM.
Posted 22 February 2010 - 05:55 PM
Posted 22 February 2010 - 06:21 PM
I have never heard of that book or the author. Is it only used in the school you attend?
Posted 23 February 2010 - 12:49 AM
Posted 23 February 2010 - 11:47 AM
Posted 23 February 2010 - 02:01 PM
Posted 23 February 2010 - 02:36 PM
Posted 23 February 2010 - 05:14 PM
Posted 23 February 2010 - 06:41 PM
The MTOC has one, I think, in the 2nd or 3rd. volume. I'm not a women, so I never tried it.
Posted 23 February 2010 - 06:46 PM
Posted 24 February 2010 - 09:55 AM
I can't believe that I just found it. After I don't know how many years, it appears I was using the wrong terninology. SLACKS! All of 2 pages worth. Just a minute and I will post it.
Posted 24 February 2010 - 10:10 AM
Posted 24 February 2010 - 10:33 AM
Posted 24 February 2010 - 10:39 AM
Posted 24 February 2010 - 10:45 AM
Posted 24 February 2010 - 10:50 AM
I think back in those days it had a negative ring about it when a "proper" lady "wore the trouser". So they called them "slacks" instead to make them sound ladylike.
Posted 24 February 2010 - 10:54 AM
Posted 24 February 2010 - 10:55 AM
No women wore pants to church until Pant Suits were invented.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users