Posted 07 December 2010 - 02:02 AM
Posted 26 December 2010 - 11:14 AM
PS: I fear my comment could be misunderstood, so I must clarify. Description is necessary, and this book is beautiful and valuable, even if what I consider explanation is not included.
This book seems to be mostly descriptive. Hardly anything is explained. For example, the first drawing shows a rider wearing double-breasted coat and in the text I believe once double-breasted is mentioned, but why the single-breasted coat dominates is not explained. I do not understand the recommendation the expression <pink> should be avoided in mixed company.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users